A student's look into the world of cinema and all its elements.



Friday, January 18, 2013

Catching up on 2012: Amour Review



Love, pain and death in one solitary expression in Amour

Amour

A+

A review by Frederick Cholowski

Love in old age is hard. Not because of the amount of time spent with a singular person or the challenges of love in general, but because of one thing, death. Death and slow loss of a partner are the ideas presented in Amour, Micheal Haneke’s powerful portrayal of an old couple hanging on to life. These ideas make Amour the most emotionally challenging film of 2012 as well the most unforgettable. There are few films that can provide images that can keep a viewer thinking about it for weeks afterwards and Amour is definitely one of those films.

After an opening scene at a concert, Amour takes place entirely within the confines of the apartment of the elderly couple of retired music teachers Georges and Anne (played by the two wonderful actors Jean-Louis Trinignnant and Emmanuelle Riva who are both in their eighties). Life is moving on as happily as ever until Anne falls victim to a small stroke that, after a failed operation, leaves her paralyzed on throughout her right side. This causes George to take care of Anne through thick and thin to avoid putting her in a hospice and after many sad deliberations about her place in this life their lives seem to move on. Then a second more devastating stroke arrives and the true challenge for the couple begins.

The power in Amour comes from the sheer honesty of the material. Haneke provides little to no melodrama to manipulate the emotions of the audience, instead the director uses a simple and honest portrayal that is simply devastating. Haneke relishes in long, still shots of silence or minimal dialogue that really drive the message home. Shots often aren’t cut for minutes and minutes on end allowing for the message of each scene to really sink into the viewer. It’s a truly powerful experience that can leave the viewer feeling a mix of complicated emotions from scenes that are so beautify simple and almost nonchalant.

The reason that these scenes work as well as they is also because of the fantastic performances given by the lead actors in Amour. Trinignnant and Riva, two actors who have been legacies of French cinema for many, many years provide two of the best performances of 2012 as they play taxing roles that require quiet subtle emotion. Trinignnant is painfully brilliant as a man who is desperately trying to keep his emotions internal while tragedy is unfolding around him. Riva is asked to do so much in this film and it’s truly stunningly painful to watch. To watch a woman who seems so nice and normal slowly die to a stroke that seemed to have come too early.

Most of the pain generated through the film comes from the way the film is shot and edited. As previously mentioned Haneke doesn’t cut shots for long stretched of time (to give an example most shots are at the longest twenty seconds Haneke can stretch shots without cutting for three-four minutes at a time) keeping the camera very still and allowing everything not only to play out but to sink in. Along with the long shots comes the lack of much of a soundtrack. Silence is this film’s best friend as it adds power to the already tragic and at times squirm inducing, long shots of simple emotions and reactions.

Amour is one of the most powerful films to come out in 2012, and perhaps in a long time. While writing the images of this film still run through my mind. The ideas and emotions may be simple, the plot unmanipulative and straightforward, but the filmmaking is so masterfully powerful that Amour can clearly place itself in the highest of high class of 2012.

No comments:

Post a Comment