A student's look into the world of cinema and all its elements.



Sunday, October 20, 2013

Homeland “Game On” Review: Back in the Game




Carrie and the mysterious lawyer on Homeland

A quick review of tonight’s Homeland as soon as I go on a car theft adventure…


“You’re an amazing person, Carrie Matheson”

-Saul


I would like to say before we get to tonight’s episode that I didn’t get the chance to review last week’s episode, but in fact I quite liked it. I thought the integration of Brody and the parallel between him and Carrie worked well as a special, more thematic episode of the show. I’ve heard a lot of negative criticism about last week’s show (on top of the positive) for the show being too farfetched about where Brody is and as a whole it didn’t work. In this case I would argue that the show has always been farfetched plot wise and that last week’s plot revelations didn’t feel that way to me and I ultimately enjoyed the episode quite a bit.


I say this in advance of this review because boy did I not like “Game On,” not one bit. For the people who thought Brody’s situation was ridiculous and farfetched then I can’t imagine how cheated one must be feeling after the big twist at the end of this one. So Carrie, who has broken down numerous times and has been locked in a mental hospital for a long stretch of time, was really just working for Saul the entire time? Just to get in with the Iranians so that she can play some sort of strange double agent role? This makes absolutely no sense from any possible angle, and is quite possibly close to the most preposterous thing the show has ever tried to pass off as a good plot line (well ok not half as bad as the thing with the vice president last year but still). First off how does that make any sense as a viable plan in any sense of the word? How could Saul have figured that the Iranians would try to take on an agent who’s mentally unstable and off the rails? Why would Carrie do all of this for a plan that could have been much better executed in every way? The whole thing just felt like a horrible cheat, one that was used just so that the writers had an excuse to keep Carrie around for the long run. It’s another massive contrivance, one that is hard to swallow after it seemed originally like the arc would have a suitable pay off.


Then there is Dana, oh Dana. I’ve said it before but the whole plot revolving around her and her now revealed to be murderer boy friend. There is no reason, at this point in the series to be keeping Dana around at this capacity, or arguably any capacity at all. It was bad enough in the first place that we got yet another Dana’s got a strange boyfriend arc, but making him a stone cold murderer makes it twice as bad if not three times. Like with Carrie it seems that the writers are just desperately hanging on to Dana and will risk increasingly terrible arcs to keep them around.


“Game On” was a compilation of all the worst parts of Homeland wrapped into one episode (well other than Mandy Patinkin who is fantastic in this episode despite the stupidity of it all). It’s going to be hard to swallow what’s coming next considering it seems that the writers really have no clue what made this show great way back in its first season.


That’s just me though. What did everyone else think?

No comments:

Post a Comment