A student's look into the world of cinema and all its elements.



Wednesday, November 5, 2014

Nightcrawler Review: Tough economic times



Lou Bloom looks at a wall of Media in Nightcrawler
Photo Credit: Elevation Pictures
 


Nightcrawler

A+

A review by Frederick Cholowski

The rags to riches story is getting darker and darker. Once upon a time it was a triumphant tale of a virtuous man or woman rising through a system that creates opportunity for good people to succeed. In 2014 we get Nightcrawler, a film that takes everything about that formula and dumps it on its head; Nightcrawler instead explores the idea of what if the rags to riches story is only achievable through despicable means. The result is a magnificent film one that ties so many strange elements together and turns them into something extraordinary.

When we first meet Lou Bloom (Jake Gyllenhaal) he’s stealing scrap metal from a chain link fence and selling it for very little. One night while driving to his tiny apartment he finds a “nightcrawler,” a camera man who takes footage of crimes as soon as they happen and then sells them to the local television news stations for a decent chunk of change. Bloom thinks that he can do it too so he buys himself a camera and a police scanner, hires a clueless assistant (Riz Ahmed), and begins selling exclusively to a ratings driven producer of the lowest rated LA channel Nina (Rene Russo). Of course Lou isn’t the let’s say “normal” type, and soon begins to do varying levels of illegal things (the example that is shown in the trailer is moving a body in order to get the perfect shot) in order to continue making more and more money and become a successful business owner.

Nightcrawler provides interesting commentary of two different areas of society. The first is a scathing satire of modern media. “If it bleeds it leads” is a line uttered early on in the film by fellow nightcrawler and Lou’s chief competition Joe (Bill Paxton) and it’s an idea that is explored throughout the film. In the world of Nightcrawler all that newscasts have become are a set of bloody events stitched together to garner ratings with zero intent to comply with journalistic ethics nor have any sort of moral compass. The terms “viewer discretion is advised” is not precautionary it’s in fact a source of intrigue for the viewer. Nina describes her newscast proudly as “a screaming woman running down the street with her throat cut.” Of course it is a little exaggerated (it is satire after all) but it does provide a thought provoking look on how society consumes news.

The other element, and most interesting subject of the film’s commentary is the look at the modern economic structure and what the American Dream has turned into. What means does a person have to go in order to achieve success? Does a person have to have morals while running a business or is making money enough? These are some of the questions that Nightcrawler asks as Lou continues to grow his business through less then acceptable means. As mentioned earlier Nightcrawler does follow a rags to riches storyline, but does it in a way that makes the viewer question the people that that story can create. Has money making really overtaking all other values in life? Nightcrawler provides a scary prospective on the society we live in and questions the moral code that it can potentially force.

The main reason why this commentary is so interesting is because of the character and performance at its centre. Jake Gyllenhaal delivers that best male performance of 2014 in this film as Lou adding a whole new world of depth to the character. All of Gyllenhaal’s small mannerisms from the wide eyes that never seem move while his eye lids are constantly twitching, to the chin that weavers when he speak help suck the audience into his character.  It’s hard sometimes to suspend disbelief enough to completely remove the actor from the character they are playing, but from the very first frame of Nightcrawler Jake Gyllenhaall is Lou Bloom. Through parts of the film it’s really easy to forget the actor completely, Gyllenhaall is that great (the comparison I made coming out of the theatre is Robert De Niro in Taxi Drive and while I don’t quite think Gyllenhaal is that great he sure comes close).

Gyllenhaal is so great that it’s hard to talk about any of the other performances. Rene Russo has the next most prominent role and she is very good here as her insanity increases after each passing moment she spends with Lou until she becomes more like him than originally imagined. Riz Ahmed does well as the clueless sidekick that gets to play off of Gyllenhaal for a lot of the film and by the end gets a few moments to shine. All the rest of the supporting performances are very solid and add to the world of the film (including Teddy Chowgugah (or at least the actor who plays him playing as close to modern Teddy as you can get)!!!!), but really this is the Jake Gyllenhaal show and the film is ultimately better for it.
On the technical side of things the film strides the line perfectly between being slick and cool without ever feeling like it’s glorifying anything that the awful Lou ends up doing. The film looks great from beginning to finish and really captures the creepy nature of the after dark business that is taking place before the viewer’s eyes. The score works nicely as well blending in a solid mix of techo and orchestral fare. It’s not as good as say a Cliff Martinez score might have been in this context but it does well for what it’s being asked to do.

Nightcrawler is a spectacular film from beginning to finish. Combining some great dual social commentary with a sleek feel and perhaps the best single performance of the year Nightcrawler ascends to superior status. Let’s just hope that in our near future our rags to riches films can become more optimistic (just for society’s sake) but for the age of cynicism that we live in Nightcrawler works perfectly.

No comments:

Post a Comment